EncodedNybble said:
If they cleaned up the animation, improved graphics etc, that's understandable. I mean they changed mario from SMB -> Mario Galaxy but it is still Mario. He still had the same basic shape, hat, etc. They made him a little more round, but overall, still mario and anyone could tell.
If I showed you a screen shot of this "new" Cole without telling you it was Infamous 2 and the screen shot didn't involve lightning, and asked "Which character is this from a PS3 exclusive?" I doubt you'd say Cole McGraph. That is the issue, it's just not the same character. He may be a better character, who knows, but it's not the same character and that is a large disconnect to me. I preordered the original, I don't think I'll even buy this one (I'm serious) unless they give some reason plot wise (that isn't lame) why the look changed. |
That is just crazy. Gameplay is what matters boy. There will (obviously) be no explaination.
Get over it. For some reason, people hate change. Look at the hate on VGC 3.0, which has now grown on me. Everytime Facebook changes, people form groups to get it back to what it was.
JUST GET OVER IT !
If they try to explain why the look changed, THAT will be extremely lame.
We'll play inFAMOUS 2 (which sounds far superior to inFAMOUS 1 based on the Game Informer preview) without you.
If you really were an InFAMOUS fan, you will probably end up buying inFAMOUS 2 anyway, so no worries. 







