Vetteman94 said:
dahuman said:
Vetteman94 said:
selnor said:
Vetteman94 said:
| selnor said:
I'm not really referring to graphics king as such. My point was there is such a small amount of difference that it is pointless. Games at this E3 were doing alot more scale and onscreen enemies and destruction than games we have now.
Technically, this E3 stepped it up.
And I'm not the one complaining or trying to make the 360 look better.
PS3 fans are the ones in this thread, talking about how they think X PS3 exclusive beats out Cryisis 2 or Rage or Bulletstorm Etc.
Funny is all I have got to say.
They all look to close to make any miniscule judgement to say the least
|
In the third post in this thread you said Crysis 2 was leagues ahead of anything else shown at E3, but now they all look too close?
|
I have made it clear that Crysis 2 sits at the top. But after that, it's to close to care. Crysis 2 was doing so much in realtime with actual play area, that it's technically a masterpiece.
|
Well from what I have seen it is way behind its older brother, and I am already upset that it has come out of the jungle so it can work on consoles. They sacrificed too much IMO. Also, the gameplay I have seen was inside a building, and it wasnt a very big building. So where was the scale during that fight?
In most cases the sequel will be better looking than the original, this is one of the exceptions sadly enough. It would have been nice to see a game finally top Crysis, but it looks like it will hold onto that crown for a year or two more.
|
lets leave PC out of this discussion, it's a big no shit that PC walks all over consoles in the graphics department. =P
|
For all we know the footage we have seen so far is from the PC build, I think someone in this thread even mentioned that it was
|
I'll bet you that it wasn't running on max, they were trying to pass it off as the console version =P. I was the first to mention it after watching the IGN interview btw, I saw 2 shortcuts to it when shit happened lol.
