richardhutnik said:
9/11 got compared to Pearl Harbor. Is that a good analogy? One act was a declaration of war by a sovereign nation, while the other was an act done by a bunch of punk individuals in a network. What is normally seen as a criminal act was turned into an act of war, and launched America on a path of foreign policy that has hinder it, costing over 1 trillion in dollars and costing an lot in credibility. So, ask me which is worse here. Do you want to say, "but 9/11 did impact foreign policy the way Pearl Harbor did"? Fine, then you can say the oil spill impacted economic and environmental foreign policy in a similar scope. |
Um, I never said 9/11 wasn't a good analogy, just that he should know there'd be hideous backlash for that.
Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita
Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte
Sugu yoko de waratteita
Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo
I will never leave you







