dark_gh0st_b0y said:
that's true, but Ps2 had almost zero competition, plus the dvd support (which was huge at that time) along with a normal price, and ALL the support from 3rd parties now, not everyone cares about Ps3's blu-ray (so some choose Xbox360), and many more choose Wii, which provides something completely different Ps3 is facing more competition, and does provide something very different than Xbox360 all in all, the difference between Ps3 and Ps2 is much smaller than what the difference is between Wii and Ps2, at least that's how average humans see it |
That is also true. I know at least five people who bought a PS2 to play DVDs. DVD players were pricey, and some cost just a little less than a PS2 or even more. Now with blu-ray, now those players are like 150 bucks. And when blu-ray players were released, they were pricey, but not as pricey as a $599 PS3. I love looking back at pre-launch forums and most gamers seem to agree that blu-ray would be to the PS3 like DVDs were to PS2. Haha totally not the case. This gen is a lot different to all the other gens, as the Wii offered a completely different experience to casual and hardcore gamers alike.
Human contact, the final frontier.