By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
RolStoppable said:

I just watched the Sorcery gameplay on youtube. So that's the game that makes people go "wow".

It didn't really "wow" me as much to say that right after watchin zelda, it seemed to have many of the same elements, but with a different setting, abilities, and tricks as well as puzzles and expandability.

The two seem very similar, and honestly I was very disappointed with zelda. I expected a lot more. Nothing has changed, and the presentation was nearly a disaster.

With sorcery, it feels like the kind of change zelda should have gotten. It's something different.


Ok dude. Whoah, lets go back to what you said. The kind of change Zelda should have gotten? WHAT?! Are you serious?! I bet you right now Socrcery wont be getting 9's when it come out. Zelda's presentation was a disaster? Why? Because of some technical difficulties note because the games is bad. Zelda > Sorcery IN EVERY WAY. Graphics, gameplay you name it bub.

So if you think Zelda should have gotten the kind of change similar to game like Sorcery, that would be a true disaster. Sorcery does not = Zelda.

I wouldn't want zelda to be like sorcery. I just would like something that isn't ocarina of time with a different artstyle.

OK THEN! So then why are you contradicting yourself?! FIRST you said its the kind of change Zelda should have gotten. THEN, you said you don't want Zelda to be like Sorcery. Come on man its beggining to sound like you're dragging up excuese becasuse Zelda had bad presentration. AND you wouldn't want Ocorina of Time with better graphics. 1. We don't know much about the game. 2. Ocorina of Time is the highest rated game of all time.

It only feels like excuses because you're being defensive.

the full quote was

"it Kind of feels like the change zelda should have gotten. It's something different"

I think you are interpreting it the wrong way. Or maybe I'm really just bad at conveying my points. But I think it's pretty clear. It doesn't say anything in there about wanting zelda to be like sorcery. It does say that Zelda should have been changed in a way that is equal to the difference between the two styles. IE, inasmuch as sorcery is different from zelda, zelda should have differentiated itself similarly from past zeldas.

Look at Legend of Zelda, Adventures of Link, Link to the past, Ocarina, Windwaker, four swords.

All very very different games. The last 5 zelda games? Ocarina, Majora, Wind waker, TP, and this one. 4 of them are almost carbon copies save for some graphical change or minor gameplay element.

Zelda deserves to do something different, and M is not that special to make a zelda feel unique.


Ok I understand that part. But still. No need to cast judgement and say Sorcery > Zelda: SS 

I'm in favor of Skyward Sword because I feel, this is the kind of game that most fans want, i mean as a Zelda fan myslef I know I want it to be like this. If it aint broke, why fix it?


I didn't. I said "Sorcery<Zelda?" with a question mark.

I know it will be good.

besides the question mark look at the thread title. you have a >

oh yeah lol I miswrote that just now. The OP is meant to have an >, like you said.


oh. ok. well anyeays the Sorcery game looks fun I will admit that.



NINTENDO

nintendo forever . . .