MARCUSDJACKSON said:
sguy78 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
sguy78 said:
HappySqurriel said:
sguy78 said:
HappySqurriel said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
sguy78 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
PDF said:
Way to early to call. Just like always though, people i know voted for him now bitch about him. It sickens me how fast this country turns on our presidents.
|
he didn't have a chance. it took 8 yr's to get a surpluse under clinton, one yr' to blow the surpluse under Bush, 8 yr's to kill not just the American economy but the global economy under Bush. (and several large finacial firms)
|
I just couldn't stop laughing after reading this post. If you actually think Bush caused this recession you are living in a dreamworld.
|
i see you didn't even look at the side not where i said and other large financial firms. your just looking for something in nothing.
P.S i don't dream but i do sleep well.
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
|
Regardless of what you wrote, the implication you made was that Bush caused this recession. One sitting President does not create a recession. There is plenty of blame to go around, but recessions are cyclical anyways. We should have gone into a recession in America earlier than we did. Gee, it couldn't be Bill Clinton who intoduced legislation opening up risky loans to people who really didn't qualify for them? Everybody deserves a chance to own ther own home, right? I'm not going to say that Clinton caused the recession because of just that. Also, Clinton wasn't the reason we got a surplus. It was Newt, and the Republican House. Get your facts straight before you continue on with the "Bush 8 years apocalypse!" crap.
|
I think you should watch the videos ...
|
I did. I'm just tired of this whole Bush is the reason for everything bad that happens. I'm surprised we haven't heard some conspiracy theory that Bush caused this oil spill 10 hours before he left office. I mean, we all know how much he hates black people in the Louisiana area.
|
regarless of what wrote! are you crazy? in that case your argument has know vality! i understand your tierd of hearring people blame Buch for the recession, but don't down play the facts when i put them out there. his spendding and other large financial firms caused the recession. facts for you. Oboma needs to clean his mess to.
theres no need for you to get mad about it. either debate it or ignore it. it's nothing for you to loss sleep over!
|
I honestly have no idea what you were writing here.
|
his spendding, tax cuts, and other large financial firms caused the recession. and thats the bottom line. politic's doesn't hold my intrust.
and regardless of what my implications are. if i add something about large financial firms in my post it can't be dismissed.
i do agree that there is plenty of blame to go around, and recessions are cyclical.
you may hate that bush is being blamed for the recession, but my advice to you is to either debate it or ignore it.
for the most part i agree with you.
i don't just blame bush. i blame everyone that had the power to stop it and didn't! those greedy basterds.
|
Look, you aren't coming up with facts. They are talking points that don't stand up to the facts. Where is it that tax cuts cause a recession? That's absolute nonsense, no offense. I didn't like his spending on a number of things as well. That is my problem with him. A sitting president doesn't cause a recession because he happens to be there at the time. People need to stop looking for government to solve their problems. How was Bush supposed to stop it? Government intervention causes it. People talk about health insurance costing so much. One of the reasons it does, is because government doesn't allow those companies to sell across state lines.
