MARCUSDJACKSON said:
HappySqurriel said:
sguy78 said:
HappySqurriel said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
sguy78 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
PDF said:
Way to early to call. Just like always though, people i know voted for him now bitch about him. It sickens me how fast this country turns on our presidents.
|
he didn't have a chance. it took 8 yr's to get a surpluse under clinton, one yr' to blow the surpluse under Bush, 8 yr's to kill not just the American economy but the global economy under Bush. (and several large finacial firms)
|
I just couldn't stop laughing after reading this post. If you actually think Bush caused this recession you are living in a dreamworld.
|
i see you didn't even look at the side not where i said and other large financial firms. your just looking for something in nothing.
P.S i don't dream but i do sleep well.
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
|
Regardless of what you wrote, the implication you made was that Bush caused this recession. One sitting President does not create a recession. There is plenty of blame to go around, but recessions are cyclical anyways. We should have gone into a recession in America earlier than we did. Gee, it couldn't be Bill Clinton who intoduced legislation opening up risky loans to people who really didn't qualify for them? Everybody deserves a chance to own ther own home, right? I'm not going to say that Clinton caused the recession because of just that. Also, Clinton wasn't the reason we got a surplus. It was Newt, and the Republican House. Get your facts straight before you continue on with the "Bush 8 years apocalypse!" crap.
|
I think you should watch the videos ...
|
it was still his congress and senate. my facts are strate. the president gets credit for what his congres does and doesn't do. u are behind. catch u
|
No, you need to get your facts straight. The last two years of the Bush administration the House and Senate were Democratically held.