| naznatips said: Remember kids, in DNF speak, 2008 translates to roughly 2018. Duke Nukem Forever = Playstation 6 and Xbox 1440 multiplat. There will be a spinoff on the Wiiiii though. Also, dschumm your sig is stupid. Just thought I'd let you know. Not to say that Duke Nukem Forever isn't going to absolutely suck, but delays to an extent can certainly help a game. For example: Brawl was delayed to add Sonic and online play. Both were not in the "original intended content or quality level." Duke Nukem Forever has been delayed Forever because the developers suck. Delays can be good. |
I could just as easily say that Brawl was delayed because of manufacturing problems with the discs or the hardware shortage. Personally I believe that they held it back because there was plenty of games already and they thought it would serve 2008 better. They have already said they want to move away from focusing all their titles on the Christmas season.
But belief in any of these theories doesn't make them true. If nintendo comes out and tells us why it is delayed, then I will believe it. All they have said is how awesome it is. And you expect me to believe that in the last couple months of production of one of the biggest games this generation the most sucessful developer in the game suddenly discovered this thing called online and decided to add it. Please....
And if you actually read my sig I didn't say delays wouldn't help a game. They are just a result of poor planning/development that caused a game to be unfinished. These games will certainly be better by completing that last 10% or so.
Final* Word on Game Delays:
The game will not be any better or include more content then planned. Any commnets that say so are just PR hogwash to make you feel better for having to wait.
Delays are due to lack of proper resources, skill, or adequate planning by the developer.
Do be thankful that they have enough respect for you to delay the game and maintain its intended level of quality.
*naznatips is exempt
