ssj12 said:
they dont deserve more then 5. current top 10 from gamerankings http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/simpleratings.asp?rankings=y |
That's an incredibly stupid argument. Gamerankings only go so far as the N64/PS1 era and barely even then because many of those games don't make the 20 review minimum. Super Mario 64 wasn't even on that list for a while because it was only listed at 19 reviews.
And the fact that they have 50% of the top games in their weakest generations show something. If you go back to the NES/SNES days, they would have a vast majority of the titles and deservedly so.







