Well I know something that's going to come from the Move that's guaranteed. The stupid debate on what's better. Analog or Pointer/Mouse. By this time next year the only group to hold onto this idea will be XBox gamers. The rest of the gaming world will be on Pointer based shooters :P
Otherwise interesting read. Though what I find is that a lot of comments in there seem to be hopeful that Sony developers can do it right rather than many Wii developers just slapping motion into their games. I wish Sony good luck on this, but i'm not going to hold my breath.
In the end i'm interested how this tech pans out. I admit at being very disappointed with developers slackluster attempts on the Wiiremote. Often alot of B-Teams get saddles with Wii development. So maybe the AAA-Teams won't be so lazy.
I'm more interested in the results of Parallax Motion in regards to the difference of the Move and Wii Remote. I find it difficult that the Parallax motion will be better on the Move, but in the Move's favor the Eye has a better tracking system than the directed IR Led. The Wiiremote can perform the same tracking, but it's limited to the angle the IR cameras of the remote are to the LED bar. So it's more limited.
I feel in the long run the Move and the Wiiremote will both have their place, but the Wii Remote will weigh as more important for overall use. Just due to the Parallax Motion being the deciding factor and not a technological one.
Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.
