Does Lady Gaga keeps getting uglier and uglier as time pass?

[sad.man.loves.vgc]

axumblade said:

sad.man.loves.vgc said:

miz1q2w3e said:

^^ wow @ the resemblance!!!! :-O

I am gonna take gaga's side this time, yes lots of copying but it's working and lots of artists copy each other so, no real harm here.

I'm not really saying there's anything wrong with it. I personally think it's a great thing that she's got her own spin on different ideas and it is possible to be creative while taking inspiration from other artists. It's just trying to say she's 100% original isn't completely true. It's nearly impossible to be 100% original and when you are, it tends to alienate people more then attract them. (look at some of Bjork's craziness as a prime example).

I agree with you, she is not original , I have stated that in my previous post *copys/pastes*

"leo, I admit , with 2 albums she captured millions and sold bilions and almost everyone knows about her but that doesn't mean her work is art.

all what she did is sounding , looking and being different, starting with her weird ass name  "Lady gaga".

Catchy melodies has been around for years and they made super stars who made endless amount of $$$$$. Simply, people got bored with many artists doing the same music sales started to decline and the catchy melodies are not enough anymore.

Gaga made sure to recapture people's hearts with these melodies by creating a unique audible and visual image by writing funky enjoyable lyrics, wearing weird clothes -or not wearing any-. In other words, she became different and people liked her.

She is smart for being able to do what she did, I give her that but to brag about her ability to write lyrics like "I am a free bitch, baby" is just..... dunno

and yeah , her clothes , dresses or whatever you call them don't show talent, they just distract people from looking at her ugly face."

see? copypasta is useful sometimes :D

she is just re"capturing" re"using" catchy melodies with some spices.