kitler53 on 09 June 2010
| Games4Fun said: I like how half the post so far are about it being misleading because people might not have bought it, got it used, got it cheaper, etc etc. It says in the freaking article that it does not take these into account. Jesus did you even read it? |
the way i read the article, "CESA estimates a loss of...." and then the author states that the number may be "questionable". CESA should have made better assumptions but they didn't, the released a ridiculous headline generating number that discredits the entire point.
