By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NeoRatt said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
NeoRatt said:
HappySqurriel said:
NeoRatt said:
HappySqurriel said:

Take Two is one of the companies that is most at risk of going bankrupt due to the success of the Wii because they fail to take advantage of it ... At the same time, Take Two would be one of the companies most at risk of going bankrupt if the XBox 360 or PS3 were as successful ...

 


...

 


...

Exclude first party stuff from the attach rate and the Wii is aweful.

Even if your royalty numbers were right, it is still cheaper to develop on 360 and you can sell your game for more money.

 


Cheaper? Bullshit. I agree that the 360 has the best attach rate, but those games do NOT cost less to develop. High end Wii games are estimated at less than half of what they would be on the 360. Developers are not disputing that.


Touchy... They cost more to develop because they are more complex and much more detailed and realistic.

So you admit your cheaper comment is false, but still have to try to justify it. The fact is that those game don't sell or flop on their graphics, so this does not prove it's not worth developing on the Wii.

Nothing on the Wii compares to Gears, Call of Duty 4, Halo 3, BioShock, etc... I have a Wii and the games are great, but they don't have near the polish in realism. Of course they cost half. Cause they look half as good... NFS Prostreet is a joke on Wii compared to 360... I have both and there is no comparison. 360 wins hands down.

I would like to see comparisons with costs on the multi-platform movie games like Rayman Rabbids, Shrek, etc...



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs