dtewi said:
Vanille did not cause Sazh to see the fact that the fal'Cie were evil. Vanille was being passive. Sazh figured out that she l'Cied his son. Vanille didn't tell him. Then Sazh decided that it wasn't Vanille's fault and then he became an active fighter against the l'Cie. Vanille didn't influence the plot, she was just there. But, maybe you think that since she was there she was vital. |
She was being passive?
So she saying for him to shoot her, as a means to alleviate the revenge he felt for the situation was being passive? She was just there.
The person that was indirectly responsible for his son situation, was just there.
In that spectrum, then you'd also have to consider Sazh non-essential to that particular piece of plot, since he was also just there by a coincidence. I mean, it wasn't Dajh who sensed both of them in Nautilus, and it wasn't Jihl who used that as a means to bring a cleavage point in both of them.
No, it all happened by pure coincidence. Also, it was coincidence that it was Vanille's willingness to sacrifice herself to seethe Sazh's rage that also led him to see part of the truth behind his son's demise. Yup pure coincidence. She was just being passive, looking at Frocobo and doing all those annoying things that you so much loathe and despise.
Current PC Build
CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"







