zero129 said:
mirgro said:
While the nano suit was all niec and great, it played a minimal part in the original. Yeah maybe you jumped on the roof a few times, or sprinted real quick, or somehow managed to be invisible to pull off a pretty cool kill. However, the big problem with the game, was that it was just a round about way of shooting up the guys in front of you and would often take you more time to use the suit's powers than jsut going in there and shooting them. The best power it had was the shield simply cause you were always in it. Also speed for when you had to move around. As said before, what was shown from all their amazing advertising, the shield mode appears to be the only one worth using still. For example, it would have been much simpler and faster to just shoot the guy in the trailer instead of sneaking behind him and breaking his neck.
Point 2, I can't count the number of times a company said they were working on a story yetmiserably failed at it.
Displaying the entire island in those opening hours of Crysis is far more impresive than rendering a few buildings and the sky. The game also fails at even that as I pointed out in another post on the first page where the display distance is miserable, and even then the textures disappear when the guy jumps.
I also wish my point is piss poor because even in the trailer the differences between their Crysis 1 fottage and Crysis 2 fottage was the locale, Crysis 1 was far more impressive when it had the lagoon in the background, and the enemies you shot and what model the "boom" came out of that you shot that you shot at the enemies. Absolutely nothing radically new and different was displayed. I really don't know how you can argue this point at all.
There are also plenty of games on consoles which are not noob friendly, just so happens that the shooter genre is the most noobed up genre in existance.
|
they already stated in this one the Nano suit is going to have a much bigger role in the game, as they where surprised with how people used it in the first etc.
and i really couldn't care if the game doesn't look better then Crysis 1 on high settings on consoles, as for me when im playing Crysis 2 on consoles it will look better as i only played Crysis 1 on medium settings and still enjoyed it, so for me this looks like a big leap without me having to get a whole new pc to play it looking this good, or else playing this on medium settings too.
and we have still not seen much of this game, you ever think maybe the draw distance etc is only like that on the console versions?, im pretty sure the PC version for the people that can run it will look great.
me on the other hand i will be playing it on console as my PS3/360 will run it better then my PC could.
but then if its opimized better then Crysis 1, maybe i might get to play this one on High settings on pc :D .
|
I am sure you have been around long enough that just because someone can talk the talk doesn't mean they can walk the walk. I go by what a developer shows, not what they say. Otherwise Molyneux would be the second coming of whatever prophet you believe in, and not a creator of meh games since the 90s.
As for how it looks, you were the first one to try and defend it by saying that its locale and display aren't small just because we haven't played the game, when they clearly are, unless they throw a complete 180 and throw you in some other locale which they haven't shown.
