By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zero129 said:
mirgro said:
zero129 said:


Nope im dodging notting, see im not the one who trys make all my opinions sound like facts.

Console noop pampering? lol now you're really showing you're true colours ;) .

im dodging nothing, as no where did i say the enviroments would be as big as Crysis 1, i just said they wont be as small as most other FPS games, after all you still have a whole City to go around in.

im not trying to say the game will be great only that it has my interests as i like what they are doing more so then the first.

You're the one stating like its fact that the game is going to be crap simply becos of it being on consoles for the "Console noop pampering" As you like to call it.

So now i ask you have you played Crysis 2? no? then its end of the discussion as the same way i dont know if its going to be good, you dont know its going to be bad.

You ever think that the smaller enviroments might make for a better game?, you ever thing since they are putting alot more into the story on this one that it might make for a better game?.

If they are working in a smaller envirement the is alot more they can work on and fine tune with the game imo.

Just look at HL2 very liner game with shit Graphics by todays standeds yet its still one of if not the best FPS games ever made, Crysis 1 big huge open island with not much of a story to it, and Graphics that still look better then anything on consoles to this day yet it pales in comperesin, remember bigger is not always better ;) .

Your pisspoor point is that if you haven't played the game you can't make a call. You completely dodged that claim and went off on a tangent.

Having played the first and now seen the second, there is zero reason to think that there will be a big difference between the two. In fact they would have been advertising all the amazing new features of the new game over the last if there really was going to be such huge differences, not the ability to display smaller environments on weaker machines and better optimization.

As for noob pampering, I don't know why you put in quotes when it is very easy to show that such staples to shooters as regening health, cover, auto-aim, etc. are made solely so that more noobish players can play the game on something other than easy and feel an achievement. In fact, you can implement just abuot all those features, without them being noobish, but developers don't want to do that either.


Ok pisspoor point, haha now you're making me laugh, are you getting tick over a game or is it just the plain fact that you might be wrong?.

i still dont see you giving any valid points how you see the is going to be no differance?.

i already did, no1 it being set in a new sitting other then an island, and the island wasn't even that big in the first one anyways, not if you compare it to say just cause 2, imo the City in GTA 4 was  as big if not bigger then the island in Crysis 1, so who is to say it wont be just as big?, and even if not its not like it matters as like i said bigger is not always better.

no 2, they are working more on story for this game then in the other one, with proper script writer and all to pan the story.

No 3 the Nano suit will have alot more powers and you can customize it to you're liking/play style, so that may mean more strategy involved since you may need to think about what to use and how to use it.

to me they are 3 majour points that i already think put it over the first one.

Now your piss poor point that you are putting across from what i can see is that the game is going to be crap cos, you cant see any differance with the first, even when i have already pointed how it is different.

and that it is on consoles = bad newbish game.

i think you should just give up now unless you got another one of them points of yours to make?.

i bet if this game was PC only you wouldn't feel so badly against it..

While the nano suit was all niec and great, it played a minimal part in the original. Yeah maybe you jumped on the roof a few times, or sprinted real quick, or somehow managed to be invisible to pull off a pretty cool kill. However, the big problem with the game, was that it was just a round about way of shooting up the guys in front of you and would often take you more time to use the suit's powers than jsut going in there and shooting them. The best power it had was the shield simply cause you were always in it. Also speed for when you had to move around. As said before, what was shown from all their amazing advertising, the shield mode appears to be the only one worth using still. For example, it would have been much simpler and faster to just shoot the guy in the trailer instead of sneaking behind him and breaking his neck.

Point 2, I can't count the number of times a company said they were working on a story yetmiserably failed at it.

Displaying the entire island in those opening hours of Crysis is far more impresive than rendering a few buildings and the sky. The game also fails at even that as I pointed out in another post on the first page where the display distance is miserable, and even then the textures disappear when the guy jumps.

I also wish my point is piss poor because even in the trailer the differences between their Crysis 1 fottage and Crysis 2 fottage was the locale, Crysis 1 was far more impressive when it had the lagoon in the background, and the enemies you shot and what model the "boom" came out of that you shot that you shot at the enemies. Absolutely nothing radically new and different was displayed. I really don't know how you can argue this point at all.

There are also plenty of games on consoles which are not noob friendly, just so happens that the shooter genre is the most noobed up genre in existance.