| chubaca said: attacking new theories is vital to science |
Yes, but of course Creationism/intelligent design isn't a Scientifi theory. Of course that makes disproving it, not only simple to do, but you don't need to be a scientest to do it as if something relies on interference from a theological being beyond the natural world. Then its already gone beyond the scope of what Science deals with and has moved into unverifiable non-naturalistic territory. Its probably more important to dispell the silly notion that it should be taught in Science class because allowing such things to be taught weakens not only the Scientific method but could lead to more crazy theories implanting themselves where they don't belong in education.







