By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dtewi said:
selnor said:

So your right in thinking he's sad because of that statement? When the only thing thats different is his opinion is different than yours. 

I think it's sad that someone cant except people like different things. And think they are sad because they are not the same. 0.0


Selnor, if someone were to say the moon is made of salsa and would plummet to earth when Tostitos goes out of business, you would say don't fault them is because that's what they think.

Even though they are factually wrong, it's their opinion that it's made of salsa, right?

Preferring a graphical leap (which is not what a game is meant to be about) than a major innovation in gameplay (which is what makes the game fun) is in fact sad. I can garner mass information from this site that will say an innovation in gameplay is much more important than an innovation in graphics. He is fundamentally wrong for believing that Graphics>Gameplay.

Come on man. WTH? You can not use a scientific element in an arguement to prove your right. Especially in an arguement where science isnt a factor at all. 

You have to understand. Someone who thinks graphics is important is going to hold to high value. Whereas you dont really care as long as it's fun to you. 

2 different preferneces.

It's perfectly fine to say someone is wrong when science has proven it to be different. To say someone is wrong when the only guage is some people have your opinion is rediculous. 

I'm not saying either 1 of you is right. I'm saying each of you has an opinion on the matter, and you will continue to like what you like.