What is your take on creationism/creationists?

[SecondWar]

NinjaV said:

SecondWar said:

DannyW said:

Evolution is all a lie. Humans started walking upright about 6000 years ago, when God made 'em from dirt. There is no compatibility whatsoever between random, purposeless, Godless evolution and Christianity or Judaism. Any divine oversight or guidance means that natural evolution never occurred. Science is full of frauds, hoaxes, misinterpreted evidence, circular logic, and fanciful flights of imagination, and has never proved that any species evolved from any other species. Fossil records are part of those hoaxes. Levathon (Sp?) is a very powerful demon that can take control of the godless and use their bodies to spread the word of lucifer. The Bible has never ever been proven wrong on anything.

Im going to relate this to video games which seems to be the only form of science you accept

If evolution is the total rubbish you believe it to be, explain to me why Super Mario Bros on the NES is not technologically equal to Super Mario Bros on the Wii. Isnt that evolution, the technology improving over time into a more advanced state?

Im not trying to offend you, Im just curious to see what your answer is.

Yes but somebody (a person) developed the new technology , the nes didn't just evolve into a snes by itself somebody developed a new system and scraped the old one.

SO!It makes perfect sense the somebody created apes and then eventually came up with better ideas scraped the old ones and created us.

Did you know that scientists recently discovered how to create a synthetic cells?heres the link. http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2010/05/20/venter-synthetic-genome-cell-bacteria.html if you read it , it actually sounds like were creating a new type of species.Some people believe that the universe is an endless amount of creators somebody created us and somebody created the people who created us and so on.

That almost sounds like ethnic cleansing, purging the old designs to replace them with the new ones. 

What I was going for was the idea that our own understanding of technology had advanced (evolved) to the point where we could turn the NES into the SNES, but thought that was a interesting way of arguing against my example.