What is your take on creationism/creationists?

[mirgro]

thanny said:

mirgro said:

There is also supporting evidence that King Arthur actually was based on a person as well, not just made up. Dragons have also been referenced in cultures which never had any form of communication with each other and the details are eerily similar (serpent, flames, wings, etc.). Meanwhile religious texts and god vary wildly among cultures.

So these are just two quick examples of fairy tales with equivalent and stronger backing than the bible. A part that is true does not make the whole true.

I did not argue that it made the whole thing true, and nor did you ask me to. You asked me to show that it has more merit then a fairy tale. Jesus was a living person and i think that gives it more merit then a fairy tale.

Depends on the fairy tale. As I said, King Athur has just as much backing, and dragons even more so.