noname2200 said:
Because it disregards all of the even-semi-credible evidence of Natal's price point in favor of "Well I don't think that's smart because (other) people are stupid, so they're going to charge less than what Sony will." It's lazy, sloppy analysis that wouldn't cut the mustard at Gamefaqs. In other words, I don't see how it's not. |
The 'evidence' that we've seen is no more credible than his statements. But one thing that I can say about his statements: they're more in line with what makes financial sense to us as consumers. The other 'reported' amounts were categorically viewed as DOA to most of us.








