By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MaxwellGT2000 said:
PakChiuCheng said:
Tekken/Virtua Fighter/Street Fighter/KOF/Blaz Blue/Soul Calibur = World Soccer

Smash Brothers Brawl = Street Soccer/Table Soccer


Brawl, alongside with Dragonball and Naruto versus games aren't technical enough to be considered a legit fighting game. (Im a Naruto fanboy but I've to admit the game is junk)

Much like your first statement, I'd honestly like to see you even try to compete with tournament brawl players and act like its not a "legit" fighting game.  Look man the fighting genre is one of my favorite game genres and I play everything from input heavy to combo heavy fighters, there's a skill to each of them, just like there's a skill to brawlers like Smash Bros, many brawlers like DBZ and Naruto don't have as deep of systems as Brawl but people like my friend who convinced me to buy Naruto UNS showed me the tactics of that game as well, he can beat me with pretty much any character and has because he knows the battle system.

I really don't get the people trying to snub other sub genres just because they don't play them, it's all fighting games, but trying to crap on one genre cause it has a different take is pretty bad, it's kinda like the people that try to crap on CoD cause they love Halo... it's just different gameplay styles.

Just because its competitive or because it has a deep system, doesn't make it into a fighter. But call it a fighter if you like, you don't get my point how hard i try anyway. What i'm just trying to point out is: that calling this game a fighter is like calling Mario Kart a racing simulator. It has some elements of a fighter but not all and therefore it isn't a fighter . There really isn't a real genre for Smash bros, but its still most like an multi player beat em up and not a fighter, i don't care how deep the game is, Starcraft is deep. Is it a fighter?