famousringo said:
I'd say it's just the opposite. The commandos were well-prepared to deal with violent, well-armed jihadists. They weren't at all prepared to deal with angry civilians armed with sticks and knives. An appropriate response would have been rubber bullets, pepper spray and batons, but all the commandos had were guns. Because Israel chose to send in soldiers instead of police, a dozen or so civilians are dead and Netanyahu gets to manage yet another international incident. I'm not convinced that shooting up the flotilla's engines would have been any safer or gone over any smoother. |
The first troops the boarded the ship were armed with paintball/practice rifles, and basic pistoles, they were unequiped to dewal with what they encountered on the ship.
Israel made a mistake, I agree with you completely, no troops should've boarded any ship, however, once the Israeli troops were attacks with knifes, Metal rods, Bats, and were thrown off the deck, the lethal retaliation was self-defensive, in order to protect Israeli troops.
It would've gone, if these ships would've entered Israel's territorial water, since International law allows neutrilizing engines of ships who enter such areas without being allowed to do so by the government, it is actually something that happens in places like the US, not all the time, but frequently enough, not to mention that Israeli navy forces train to preform manuvers just like that, so that they can cause as little damage as possible.
Bet with Dr.A.Peter.Nintendo that Super Mario Galaxy 2 won't sell 15 million copies up to six months after it's release, the winner will get Avatar control for a week and signature control for a month.