RageBot said:
Probably. The real mistake on Israel's part is the fact that they didn't take into consideration the possibility that some of the "peace activists" are violent Jihadist calling for the death of Jews. And anyway boarding these ships was a mistake, the Israeli forces should've just neutrlized their engines (after entering Israeli waters) and make the ship stop in their tracks, while providing food, until the "peace activists" would agree to hand over the supplies (like they should've done in the first place). |
I'd say it's just the opposite. The commandos were well-prepared to deal with violent, well-armed jihadists. They weren't at all prepared to deal with angry civilians armed with sticks and knives. An appropriate response would have been rubber bullets, pepper spray and batons, but all the commandos had were guns.
Because Israel chose to send in soldiers instead of police, a dozen or so civilians are dead and Netanyahu gets to manage yet another international incident.
I'm not convinced that shooting up the flotilla's engines would have been any safer or gone over any smoother.
"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.