By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tk1989 on 11 May 2007
Edit Thread
Blue3 said:
Gballzack said:
Blue3 said:

LOL

It occurs to me you have no clue what the hell you are posting bout. Many Ea games sale better on PS3 then Wii, and those are only 360 ports. The last thing devs need or want is to go toe to toe with a Miyamoto game on a nintendo platform. Devs are alot better of making a multi platform 360/Ps3 and maybe PC game.

Nintendo fanboys need to get a reality check.


If EA games are doing so much better on the PS3 then why is EA reporting losses after the first quarter?

If PS3 has the better 3rd party versions, why is it selling so poorly? Why have 360 sales all but stagnated?

Reality check indeed. How long do you think you can keep riding this wave of believing shitty PC-wannabes like the 360 and PS3 can actually beat the Wii in the long run?

Right now Developers who want to make pretty games are sacrificing their craft for the 360 and Ps3, eventually they're realize the compromise of the Wii is worth it and the games you lust after on your pseudo-PCs will move to the system that makes them money, the Wii.


Maybe becasue their games are selling like crap on the wii.

Reality check wii fan boy, your console uses 10 year old technology. Everything good about a game has to be sacrified to make it work on that weak console.

Ps - wiis hardware is so great it cant even run next gen game engines lol.

 

 

Ok, you are totally contradicting yourself...

In the earlier Sales numers you quoted for the Wii, PS3 and Xbox 360, the PS3 and Wii were basically the same. They both had very similar sales, take or give a few thousand. Therefore, you are basically saying these games are selling crap on the PS3 as well.

 Now, about development costs. Ok, all these games were ported from the 360 to the PS3 to try and get them out for the PS3 launch etc, but then again all these games were ported to the Wii as well. Im pretty sure that it costs a hell of a lot more to port a game to the PS3 then it does to port it to the wii, so your argument is flawed. Nevertheless, if my guesses are wrong then it doesnt matter; the only reasons why those games were ported was to make them ready for launch, and more than likely from now on EA and Activision will make versions for each console, making sure that they highlight each consoles strengths. When this happens, Wii will have significantly lower development costs, because the PS3 costs loads to make games for (if i remember correctly, a game has to sell at least 500,000 copies to actually make a profit, a feat that many many games have not reached yet)>

 Also, what do you think defines "next-gen"? Personally, i believe next-gen is something innovative and different.