| dirkd2323 said: Hell NO, The PS3 still has plenty left, we are seeing games still look better and better, The reason we don't see tons of games at Native 1080p is because it cost a lot more money, and native 720 p looks great, I have developers in family, I get all the scoop, but 360 hardware is out dated, all games look the same since gears 2 , the PS3 is getting there but theres some more there to play with, and the biggest reason is because, with PS3 games like U2 did not even use the RSX for graphics, they were able to code it for the cell to process, which is ossum, 360 can't do that, then they can still use RSX for other smaller tasks for graphics , while the cell is churning in data, 8 processors on the cell alone, makes for ways to split up the direction, as long as the developer can sink all the data together is what sets the PS3 apart, and the 360 graphically can't hang, but sinking all that also costs more money , and takes longer, but you get a better game, Also the PS3 has a better sound processor, for game sound, I am running 7.1 at m y house, and the surround sound from my PS3 , kills the sound from my 360. But we will see some more great games from Sonys first party developers that will raise the stakes again and again. |
cost is not a factor in resolution if the hardware can render in 1080p then they would do it in 1080 , truth is the consoles cant do 1080p games with high budget graphics , its just a matter of hardware not cost of developing a game. tell me why a pc can display above 1080p and run at waaay faster framerates when the pc market is not making as much money with games as the consoles?
secondly uncharted 2 very much used the gpu for its visuals but also used the cell to take some load off the main graphics chip, yes the cell has 8 processors but one is for yield and one is for the os , so that leaves 6 spu for games.
i understand you love your ps3 but you clearly dont really understand that a current gaming pc is 3 times as powerful and would be able to produce a game like god of war3 in 1200p at 100fps and it wouldnt cost the developers anymore money to make it , realistically it would cost them less money because the software would need less optimizing due to the hardware being so much more powerful and versatile
