Do any of the Halo titles deserve critical acclaim?

[ironman]

max power said:

zero129 said:

Bladeforce said:
look mate you posted minor changes nothing ground breaking. I for one wont be answering in 20 years the game that first used the butt of your gun to kill enemies LOL I will admit for a console the halo franchise has helped microsoft spin into the minds of adolescents easier than before for their money but as groundbreaking titles, please these things have been on PC for years nothing groundbreaking about Halo

Well how much did Galaxy 2 re-inavate the 3d platforming games?.

do you think galaxy 2 deserves its 10's its been getting?. i do

the same way i think the Halo games deserve their scores.

so dont be acting like a bitter 12 year old fanboy who is just upset cos the isn't a FPS on the wii that could hope to be as good as or as succesful as halo...

And oh yeah i bet you thought the original Goldeneye on N64 was just a Doom clone too right?, or are you even old enough to remember that game?.

There's nothing wrong with taking the better parts from other games, but there are many people who mistaken credit Bungie for inventing everything except possibly the wheel.

The problem with Halo is not that others did it before on PC, it's that others did it better before on PC.

That's a weak argument. Bungie was the first to successfully implement a FPS on a console.