Reasonable said:
me too! I mean it as a serious observation. The 360 has been a big success for MS in my view but looking at it impartially they need to be careful they don't loose too much steam around core titles going forward. I'm sure they're building a lot of stuff for Natal, and it looks likely they can depend on Epic and Valve for some decent titles - but they can't count on them. Valve could decide to push their entire back catalogue on PS3 if they choose to, they own the IP after all, and Gears aside Epic could easily support PS3, too. They have Mass Effect, but anything else from Bioware will be multi via EA now. They have the studio looking after Halo but really I think they need more. Nintendo and Sony are going to keep pumping out exclusives until the end of their consoles lives, and MS are looking a little lean on ability there, relying on deals with companies who could just as easily decide they want to go multi-platform and build their brand acorss more gamers.
|
It wouldn't be a problem if the 3rd party games they bought/agreement actually stayed exclusive. That would make the library stong enough Bioshock, Splinter Cell (bound to happen), Valve, GTA DLC ect, but gamers KNOW they're going to go to the PS3, so think why bother.
So when next gen starts, and Microsoft buy a bunch of 3rd party exclusives, non "720" owners arnt going to be so quick to pick the console up, they'll just wait for them to enevitably go to the PS4.
I do honestly believe they're going to sort this out soon though, they must know it's an issue.







