Jordahn said:
Seece said:
Jordahn said:
Seece said:
Jordahn said:
Seece said:
Jordahn said:
Seece said:
Well I'm glad Sony own R&C and Resistance, because I'm not interested in those franchises, however they are quality games (all 4 all just missed 90 on meta)
I hope their next franchise interests me ... |
And does this have ANY substance to the gamer? Thank God it doesn't!
|
It's an INDICATION to the quality they put out, compared to say, if they were all 75 rated on meta. So yes it does actually ...
|
Hey, that cool. I do try to respect other opinions... sheep...
;)
|
What's metacritic got to do with sheep? :-S
a game rated around 90 on meta shows good quality, a game say 70 .. doesn't show near as good quality.
You'll just get yourself banned with silly comments like those, come back with a mature response ...
|
Are you trying to say that if "game a" receives an average rating of 88.2% while "game b" recieves an average of 92.7%, I'm supposed to automatically enjoy "game b" more than "game a" and agree it's better. WHATEVAAAAAA makes you sleep at night!!! And cool your jets, bub. Please notice the winky-smiley-face at the end of the post. Regardless, I still have a valid point.
:)
|
No that wasn't my point at all.
|
Then there was NO point in pointing out that Insomniac's PS3 games "just missed 90 on meta".
|
Hmm, sorry to interrupt... but at least to me he said that as a compliment to the games, not to bash them.
