Final-Fan said:
The thing is that this is crazy. The fact that we work to eliminate racial segregation doesn't mean that we should logically also work to eliminate men's and women's toilets. Dealing with it on a case by case basis as you might say. |
I think why you think this approach is crazy is because you make the assumption that the status quo would have been preserved in the south. Laws that encouraged or enforced systemic segregation would need to be eliminated, and all institutions or organizations that received government funding would be forced to integrate; because the government has no right to discriminate against its citizens. While it wouldn’t have the immediate impact of government forced integration, as more and more businesses integrated public sentiment would move more and more towards integration; and segregation in the south would have (mostly) eliminated itself.
One thing that people don’t seem to consider is that segregation is the kind of social norm which needs to be externally re-enforced in order to be preserved; and (over time) as people were put into more and more situations where they were integrated the fear of integration would disappear and support for segregation would vanish. Or to put it another way, if you’re dealing with people of all races at school, at the DMV, or when you’re eating at McDonalds it is unlikely that many people would purposefully continue to seek out segregated environments.