By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Smidlee on 24 May 2010
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
Smidlee said:
Cheebee said:
Bcuz t3h Wii iz for kiddiez & Nint3ndo iz d0med!!1


... Seriously though, that's what I gathered, from about half of IGN's user reviews.

I read some of the reviews (no where near half of IGn users) and it seems the biggest complaint is it got 10 for graphics. I have to agree some on this. While this game is probably the best Wii can do still the Wii 64 mb ram GPU is really showing it age. I'm not referring to the fact Wii games are only in SD either. If a PC game looked like this is would clearly take a hit in the graphics no matter what kind of hardware the game could run on.

 


No offense, but you're making the same mistake as a lot of the haters; forgetting that "graphics" is as much -if not more- about art than technical power.

Galaxy 2 has impeccable aesthetics, uisng colours, shapes, composition and effects to stunning artistic effect, as well as pushing the system technically. Heck, it's one of the prettiest games I've ever seen personally. It would be hard for any game to look better on the hardware, hence the 10/10.

I'm not a hater and said nothing about the games art. I didn't suggest it shouldn't score high but if it on any other system it would no doubt take a hit or two on graphics. With that said I  do enjoy playing PC games that doesn't have the best graphics. The fact a lower graphic game can run on a laptop doesn't stop the game from taken a  hit either.  Even HD consoles games are compared to their PC counterpart.

 So while you no doubt disagree I can easily see why some disagree with a 10 score for graphics.