By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Tuganuno on 23 May 2010
Edit Thread
jesus kung fu magic said:
Tuganuno said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
Tuganuno said:
The best games of this generation are exclusives. So yeh.

The majority of the AAA titles this gen have been multiplats so no

The games that pushed consoles to the max on this generation are exclusives. Games like MGS4/GoW3, Gears of War/Alan Wake, and basically any First Party game of Nintendo - Super Mario Galaxy 2, for example.

For example, and this is just an example because I'm not sure if this rumour is true, but FF didn't get as much content because of the 360 version. Besides, games take time to port, and some developers can't afford to delay the release date.

If a company spends 100% of the time developing a game for a X platform instead of just 80%, the exclusive game will obviously be better than the multiplat.

RDR , Bioshock are better than the games you mentioned save SMG2.....and there are also games like Fallout 3 , ES4:oblivion , COD4 , Batman:AA just to name a few.

You dont have to be exclusive to be good and you also dont have to push the system to be good.....id rather a developer be creative than just try to pump out polygons from the system.

Lol? You can't just say "Bioshock and RDR pwn everything you previously said, your argument is invalid". I mean, that doesn't even make sense, some games aren't in the same genre. Besides, it's your opinion, can't take that as a fact.

All I said is that exclusives max out the console's potential and that's true, there is no way around it. Think of PS3 games. Multiplats look like shit, even tho exclusives like Uncharted 2 and GoW3 are some of the best looking games on this generation.

Therefor, a game that is exclusively developed for a console will always be better than the same game if it was developed for several platforms. And due to these reasons, my interest in exclusives > multiplatforms.