Theo on 22 May 2010
This all sounds too good to be true. 3D was a pretty big suprise, I can fully understand 3D for racing, but for such a detailed shooter ... hmm I dunno. Don't they have to double the frame-rate for it to work smoothly? Killzone 2 had an average framerate of 26-28 fps with motionblur to compensate. And now destruction?
Well anyway, Killzone 2 was one of the greatest looking games of all time, they must have some super geniuses down at GG pulling more out of the PS3 than anyone else can and I'm sure Killzone 3 will be even more sick this time around.
