Garnett on 22 May 2010
| MikeB said: @ d21lewis Soooo......you're saying that if the 360 didn't get a lot of the titles that were considered exclusive to the PS3 The first parties are still exclusive, the 3rd parties you are talking about have always been multi-platform. The reason why many 3rd parties went PS1 or PS2 exclusive was mainly because of cheap CD media (PS1) and the PS2 dominating the market (other platforms being of less relevance), before that you can easily see they were already multi-platform companies. |
Why would 3rd partys keep making games on the weakest platform last gen and all of a sudden this gen they want "the full power" of something?
Sony paid them to keep it exclusive, just like MS has done.
But yes i support exclusivity, because certain games just depend on certain platforms.
