Xyrax on 17 December 2007
| omgwtfbbq said: well a couple of things are important in this post: 1) $200 in 2 years unrealistic? That's a real problem. It shouldn't be, otherwise Sony is going to be in trouble |
Well I look at it like this from Trettons point of view. $200 in two years in itself isnt unrealistic. However, you need to remember PS3 has already dropped $200 in one year. Thats an ENORMOUS drop ENORMOUSLY fast, and all the while, they have been losing money on the hardware. So another 200 in another 2 years is unrealistic for the PS3 because that would equate to 400$ in 3 years. That is just madness if they ever want to catch up with the manyfacturing costs and ever make any actual money on the thing. They cant keep dropping the price at this insane rate, or else they just stay behind on cost forever.
