omgwtfbbq on 17 December 2007
well a couple of things are important in this post:
1) $200 in 2 years unrealistic? That's a real problem. It shouldn't be, otherwise Sony is going to be in trouble
2) Don't Sony set the usual price of games on their console?
3) Of course Activision is interested in their business. But only in terms of how many PS3s there are, they couldn't care less how much money Sony is making. So I don't quite understand his point here. Activision would do best with lower priced consoles, because that means more consoles sold and a larger user base to sell games to, and ultimately, more games sold.
Help! I'm stuck in a forum signature!
