Vetteman94 said:
ironman said:
Vetteman94 said:
ironman said:
Vetteman94 said:
ironman said:
In your mind, you are indeed putting the well being of an animal in front of the life of a human being, you feel sorry for the dog, not as sorry for the human being. No matter how you spin this, those are in a nutshell, your words. I'm not faulting you for this, I'm faulting society. We've arrived at a horrible place.
|
Qoute me where I said this?
|
You said the the dog video was the only one that bothered you, you weren't even bothered by the one where the guy gets tortured, then murdered.
|
And where does bothered = sorry? In any language in the world where are those two words linked?
|
How about the English language. Bothered is used in the same context as sorry in many cases. Either way, you were bothered about the dog, and not the human being. My point still stands.
|
In no cases can bothered be used in the same context as sorry, zero, not once. Your concept of the english language is skewed if you think so. Your point may stand but you are still wrong
|
Yes it can, here, "I was sorry to hear about your dog dying," Hearing about your dog dying really bothered me" Simple easy, on-topic. My point still stands, and I am still right. You feel worse about the dog video than you do the one where a human being was murdered. There is something very wrong with that.
