By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
To me, this line of thinking will only hurt the industry. Consoles sharing over 60-70% of libraries means there's little to no point in making more than one. May as well have a universal console, which IMO, would be a tragic move.

with 3rd party, yes but 1st and 2nd party are where you seperate each system. Both Sony and Nintendo have invested well into their 1st and 2nd party moreso this time , and their game's are showing fantastic result's.

Sadly though Microsoft seem's to be In my opinion dragging their feet on first party investment. Which has alway's seem to me to dilute your system's overall value if your 1st party or 2nd party is not very strong. I felt that way about the PS2 though it was and still is a fantastic system like the xbox360 the 1st party and 2nd party offering's were not very strong. which is fine and all, but unless you want to keep paying every 3rd party developer to keep extending the exclusive's to only your platform it's only going to remain expensive to do so, because of the overall cost.

This generation is where I think the PS3 have shined is in it's 1st and 2nd party game's even over quite a number of 3rd party quality game's.

 



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.