Do any of the Halo titles deserve critical acclaim?

[chocoloco]

Barozi said:

chocoloco said:

Truthfully this question has been asked so many times on videogame forums that all that comes out of it is that there are alot of differant opinions.

Of course mine is absolute, and the first two deserve a ton of praise well every thing that follows is downhill!

The Halo series is no worse than any other series in the end its a godanm videogame!

PEACE!!!

Well I just want to know why Halo 3 suddenly is so much worse than Halo 2.

In the end they are VERY comparable and none of them did suddenly change the entire gameplay. (only talking about Halo 1-3 here)

So why is Halo 3 worse ?

I don't know a single thing where Halo 2 could have been better than Halo 3. Enlighten me.

First off don't talk my show of arrogance seriously as no on has an absolute opinion.

The main reason I did not like Halo 3 as much, was because it had a very short campaign.  I did not like that because I love playing the series coop and it was dissapointing to have it end so qucikly. Also I did not enjoy the multiplayer as much as I did for Halo 2. I thought the maps were less exciting, but thats just me.  Though this was an early 360 game, even months before I bought the game I watched people playing it and my first thought was  the graphics did not impress and I expected more. At that time I had no this gen console and had only seen a few games, but I still thought the graphics were weak, and I certainly maintain that original impression.

Still I never said it sucked it was just not as good for me.