PhoenixKing said:
They're "atheist" in the sense that they think that other religions are false beliefs the same as atheists do. They don't state it outright, of course, but I've spoken to some and they admit, if you really believe that one religion is the truth then it denotes that the other religions are fake in their minds. In THAT regard, they are "as athestic" about other religions as atheists are. At the broadest sense, they believe God is being worshipped the wrong way in other religions. So, I'm not saying they atheists, I'm saying they can be looked upon that way because the share the same qualities atheists do regarding religions that they don't believe in. But, you're right, they should be counted as theists anyway. I worded that wrong previously. |
I really don't follow your logic on why athiesm is on any more solid ground by your reasoning...if one of the religions is right athiesm is wrong just as well as other religions are. If any one theory among athiesm and theism of any form is correct, then the rest of the theories pretty much by definition are wrong whether they share their theistic status or not.
As for theism being a 'form of' athiesm...no this is an oversimplification of the issue. A theist might believe another theist has the details wrong but they all agree on the fundamental existence of a higher power. An atheist disagrees on the fundamental point. These are the definitions of what seperates these groups, there is no more clear way to define them than by this fundamental disagreement.
Simply pointing out that a given atheist and a given theist can have similar beliefs in regards to a second theistic belief system does not override their disagreement on the fundamental question of whether god exists, particularly when the given atheist and theist will have vastly different reasoning for why the other theistic belief system is off...and in many cases the two theistic belief systems will probably exhibit considerable overlap.








