So... how about that Tea Party?

[Kasz216]

NinjaguyDan said:

Kasz216 said:

sieanr said:

Hahaha

The tea party has an inflated sense of self worth. They may claim that they represent the silent majority, or some such nonsense, but they don't.



http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/04/14/us/politics/20100414-tea-party-poll-graphic.html?ref=politics

NYtimes is a horrible polling group compared to the ones i've posted.  Gallup & Raussermin.

I'd trust Gallup over a NYTimes/CBS poll anyday.

Heck, just by compairing the two's methods you can see why the NYtimes poll sucks.

Rasmussen is nothing more than right-wing propoganda.

More damning charts here.

If you don't believe it then prove it wrong.

Ok... how about instead of comparing it to other polls.... you compare it to reality. 

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2004/state_by_state_actual_results_vs_rasmussen_reports_polls

http://www.fordham.edu/images/academics/graduate_schools/gsas/elections_and_campaign_/poll%20accuracy%20in%20the%202008%20presidential%20election.pdf

 

Rausserman.... #1 in accuracy in both the 2004 and the 2008 Election.

 

What your doing is comparing Vgchartz japan numbers to Famtisu and Media Crate... what I'm doing is comparing them to the actual numbers.

When you combined the two together... Rausmmeran #1 in accuracy + right bias vs other polls... that = Most polls are incorrectly biased leftwing.

 

If you don't believe it... prove it wrong.  Since, you know... I proved you wrong.