Carl2291 said:
mysticwolf said:
Carl2291 said:
mysticwolf said:
That is the answer to the question of the title of this thread
|
So. Let me get this right. Some Nintendo fans are angry because...
Sony's remote is black, while the Wii's is white.
Sony's has a wireless sub-controller, the Wii's doesn't.
Sony's has a big coloured ball on the end, the Wii's doesn't.
Sony's uses a camera to work, the Wii's doesn't.
Sony's is more accurate than the Wii's.
Sony's cannot be tilted to be used like a traditional controller, the Wii's can.
OT:
I think it's more to do with the more hardcore Wii fanbase being worried of 3rd parties reaction to it. If it sells well enough, we could see 3rd parties show even less attention to the Wii. ESPECIALLY if Natal takes off too. I predict lots of butthurt talk after E3, if Natal is looking good...
|
Looks don't matter. It's the same thing, it just looks different.
Nintendo could've made the Nunchuck wireless if they wanted too, but they didn't.
Of course Move will be more accurate! Technology always gets better as time goes on.
If Nintendo wanted to make entirely new and more accurate controllers, they could. But instead of making customers buy entirely new controllers, they made Motion+
|
If looks don't matter than why did you post a pointless picture showing how the 2 controllers look?
|
ignore them they are all butt hurt because the wiimote is not as good as ps move, as it has augmented reality and it can also do some things that natal can do like body tracking, notice how no-one is attacking natal, it looks like ps move may well be more succesful then we all think and the ninty fans now that which is why they keep on attacking it.
not to mention it already has better games for it, even though wm+ has been around for a while and all they got was wii sports resort that was worth getting i mean all that for a £40 add on i would be pissed off as well, which is why i did not bother with wm+ and will just get ps move instead
