JamaicameCRAZY said:
RolStoppable said:
pizzahut451 said:
RolStoppable said:
DaHuuuuuudge said:
It seems that Nintendo fans define "huge" as sales, rather than review scores.
It seems that Sony fans define "huge" as review scores, rather than sales.
Which one effects the average gamer more? |
Sales, because the more a game sells, the more likely it is that the average gamer gets exposed to the game and learns about its existence.
|
reviews have something to do with games's quality, sales dont
|
What a narrow minded point of view.
Of course sales can be a testimony to a game's quality. If a game keeps on selling for months or years, then that is proof that the game is doing something right. Otherwise bad word of mouth would have killed its sales by that point. Strong legs are a better indicator for quality than review scores.
|
Not all games that sell well are quality. Mw2 is garbage and its selling like hot cakes. Sales can be influenced by advertising, hype, ect. Popularity is not always a good indicator of qualitly. If it was always then Avatar would be the greatest movie ever.
|
It is your opinion. For me MW2 is excellent game. 24 h in single player and 200 h in multiplayer and I still play it constantly.
... and yes Avatar is the best science fiction film in the last 10 years for me.
