By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dtewi said:
lestatdark said:
Khuutra said:
lestatdark said:
Johann said:

Venat also acomplishes exactly what he set out to do.

I don't consider him too much of a villain though. An antagonist, sure, but not a villain.

 

Venat's motives are completely different from total destruction. 

Venat wanted to go against the will of the Occuria, to give mankind their rightful place in Ivalice, ending the era of the gods (the Ocurrians).

Kefka just wanted to become god itself, if he had to destroy to world to do it, then it didn't matter for him. 

I would argue that you have it backwards with Kefka - he just wanted to kill people and destroy lives, and becoming an all-powerful force of nature was just a means to that end.

Well, if that was indeed his final goal, he could have just completely obliterated the world right? He reveled in the pain and the suffering, what better way than to experience a cataclysm of pain than to become a god of mysery himself? 

He actually didn't want obliteration, he took happiness in the suffering of others, and simply killing everything at once wouldn't be fun.

That's....what I just had said...



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"