Bobo012893 said:
Yes. Guerilla. Really. Killzone 1, while not received well critically, was engaging and a solid first esstablishment from a newly formed studio. Killzone 2 meshed beautiful artistic and graphical qualities, a style of gameply that was both unique and realistic, and a compelling and provacative storyline (excluding Rico - I FUCKING hate him) thus establishing a new benchmark for modern First Person Shooters. Halo 3 on the other hand, while certainly fun and engaging, was regurgitated and presented nearly nothing to advance the genre as a whole (Halo 2 was this way as well). I will not deny that the Halo franchise is paramount to the establishment of the genre on consoles and that each installment is a great game (I love Halo), but to state that "Guerilla is not even close to Bungie" without ever playing either of their games is ignorant and completely FUCKING stupid. I hold no personal grudge towards you and note that my harsh language is in no way an insult, this is just how I communicate with people. I would respect your views if you had any personal experience with the Killzone franchise. However, you do not so i think that it would be wise to while not necessarily agree with my views, respect them as I have more experience with Killzone and, in all probability, Halo than you do. |
Don't even get started about advancing the genre. I guarantee you I can list more innovations from Halo 2 and Halo 3 than you could from Killzone 1 and 2. I don't care if that's how you talk, its disrespectful and shows you as a child. I also don't care how much you liked the original Killzone it did not stack up with any of the Halo's, standing still to snipe was a joke. So no you can't use one good game to set a developer equal to one that has been releasing nothing but top quality software from its inception.
The definitive evidence that video games turn people into mass murderers








