Solid_Snake4RD said:
Lord Flashheart said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
superchunk said:
LOL to anyone who thought only PS3 could do it... lol, you know your out there.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, PS3's 3D (as all home 3D at this point) is a huge flop of shit and needs to be skipped by the consumers. The manufacturers need to realize we won't pay $100's for each pair of glasses just to watch 3D at home.
If costs prevent glassless 60" tvs, then at least utilized the passive system theaters use. Worked just fine for Avatar and every other 3D movie and would only cost a few bucks, if that for each pair of glasses. Then I wouldn't mind my 4yr old wearing them or buying 20 for the big sporting events. |
wtf are you talking abt?
Only PS3 can do 3D IN THE CONSOLES SECTION.
This 3D that LG and MS are touting is not real 3D production.This is only how 3DTV's can convert 3D in 3D,they can do this with any media.Even with PS1.
Originally developed and converted 3D will have big differences
|
I refer you to Avatar and me at Gadget show.
Looked like real 3d on an xbox to me.
|
wat?
real 3D from 360 is possible on 360 but with HDMI 1.2,it would be SD or lower.
PS3 has HCMI 1.3 thats why they can output 3D with the existing graphics
|
Maybe you should try it first before commenting.
I didn't realise you meant SD. As you never said that.
I thought you said only the PS3 can do 3D and that what MS and LG are touting is not real 3D.
Well you're wrong. No amount of backtracking will change that.
It seems from others that you was wrong about 3D being in SD as well. Didn't look SD to me.
