puffy said:
superchunk said:
LOL to anyone who thought only PS3 could do it... lol, you know your out there.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, PS3's 3D (as all home 3D at this point) is a huge flop of shit and needs to be skipped by the consumers. The manufacturers need to realize we won't pay $100's for each pair of glasses just to watch 3D at home.
If costs prevent glassless 60" tvs, then at least utilized the passive system theaters use. Worked just fine for Avatar and every other 3D movie and would only cost a few bucks, if that for each pair of glasses. Then I wouldn't mind my 4yr old wearing them or buying 20 for the big sporting events. |
You'd need two projector lenses (or two projectors) each polarized differently for that to work. It'd be more expensive than the current set up even if you included 10 shutter glasses in the price and more importantly, it wouldn't be LCD technology which means big, bulky rear projection or just a projector, which isn't a TV.
|
puffy is right but i would also like to add that the glasses less tvs that support multi-user viewing require input 4x larger than HD which means that even blu-ray can't support a feature length movie on a single disc. i get the part where glasses are annoying but for now shutter glasses is the only at home 3D tech even remotely mass market priced.
