Soleron said:
There was a projection on the BBC. The result if the 2010 election was repeated under AV would be (approx): Labour 260, Conservative 280, Liberal 80. As opposed to approx Labour 250, Conservative 300, Liberal 50 now. Yes, the Liberals' position would be improved numerically more, but look how close Labour is - and it's that margin that really determines who forms the goverment. And that's in the most Conservative leaning election since 1992 or perhaps earlier. If the two had equal vote share it would be a massive Labour majority. If it was a Labour leaning election they would have an insurmountable lead. The Conservatives would need a 10% lead in the popular vote to even form a government. Labour would only need parity or perhaps less. That's not fair.
The reason is this. The most common kind of marginal is LAB and CON in first or second then LDEM in third. You're right, most LDEM would put LAB as their second choice. So when LDEM is elminated in most contests, thoe votes are given to LAB - and they win almost every seat of this kind, because LAB+LDEM almost always > CON by a large margin. |
which is why I (and the Lib Dems) support STV instead







