| jarrod said: Sales are an objective measure. How else would one measure the objective "worth of a game"? I said pricepoint gap, not budget gap. Wii games cost $10 less than PS360 games. A Wii costs the same price as a 360, $100 less than a PS3. A Micra costs $135,000+ less than a Bentley (for the cheapest model, it can be upwards of $400,000 in difference if you're comparing midline). You seem to enjoy using the term "rediculous" (ie: ridiculous I'm guessing), I'd say nowhere in this thread is that a more appropriate description than this reaching and illogical analogy you keep pushing. Reread what I wrote. Slowly. I said Wii Play is more traditional. Christ. edit: "It" refers to Wii Play. Sorry I should have made that clearer
Also...
|
Sales mean nothing about something being better. Sales just mean something has been successfully sold, that is it. If you want something better to look at, but far from perfect, metacritic is a better idea.
Oh so the selling point of the wii and PS3 has nothing to do with the games? Fail. Why do you keep mentioning Wii play? I know it's more traditional, so what...?
You really trying to say the iPod is being sold as a gaming device. **** off trolll, **** off.
Read the advert - music, movies, games.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Apple-touch-Latest-version-Launched/dp/tech-data/B002MRRRP0/ref=de_a_smtd
Nowhere advertises it primarily as a game device, it just has the capacity to play them. Like how many places advertise a PSP on the main point that it plays UMD or music and not games?
Quit delving into the realms of stupidty kid.
