The issue with terrorism is that its extremely difficult to define. Most definitions (not all mind) I've read are pretty weak and could equally be applied in some ways to military action for example.
Its simple Socratic method. If you've found significant exceptions to your view that Terrorism cannot be justified then your problem with the fact that it potentially can be justified is your problem, not terrorisms. If ones viewpoint isn't logically on very solid ground then you can either stick your head in the ground or shift your opinion. Ones really idealistic (which can both be good or dangerous) and ones pragmatic and involves ones intellectual growth.
the fact that there a fear that saying yes would make people think ones a terrorist is sad.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
